Yoga
- India’s Gift to the World!
International Day of
Yoga celebrated on June 21
In
2014 Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi during his UN General Assembly Speech
called for observing International Day of Yoga and remarked it as “India’s Gift
to the World”. Pursuant to his proposal, the UN on December 10, 2014 declared
June 21 as “International Day of Yoga”, recognizing that Yoga provides a
holistic approach to health and well-being.
Through the resolution, adopted under the agenda of 'Global
Health and Foreign Policy,' the 193-member general assembly decided to proclaim
June 21 every year as the 'International Day of Yoga'. June 21 was decided as International
Day of Yoga as it is the longest day in the Northern
Hemisphere and has special significance in many parts of the world.
Source: http://indianexpress.com/
The Rajpath became Yogpath on Sunday when 35,985 participants
from 84 nationalities performed asanas at one venue for 35 minutes with the
Indian Prime Minister.
The Ministry for AYUSH was awarded two world records by
Guinness World Records (GWR) officials at a ceremony at The Ashok for 'Largest
Yoga lesson' and 'Most nationalities in Yoga lesson'.
While the whole world is stretching its muscles, we thought
of analysing the IP perspective of YOGA.
- I. Yoga & Trademark
Registration No.
|
Trademark
|
Proprietor
|
Class
|
Status
|
412341
|
YOGA
|
Premchand Devchand Shah
|
Class 3- Aggarbathies and dhoop
|
Registered, however the valid upto date is not mentioned on
Trademark Registry’s website
|
455317
|
YOGA
|
Apollo Pencils Pvt. Ltd.
|
Class 16- Lead Pencils
|
Registered, however the valid upto date is not mentioned on
Trademark Registry’s website
|
705404
|
|
Amrish Krishnaraj Mody
|
Class 3- Bleaching Preparations And Other Substances For Laundry Use,
Cleaning Polishing Scouring And Abrasive Preparations, Soaps, Perfumery,
Essential Oils, Cosmetics, Hair Lotions, Dentifrices
|
Registered, however the valid upto date is not mentioned on
Trademark Registry’s website
|
900173
|
|
Jose Joseph
|
Class 25- Footwear
|
Registered and valid upto January 28, 2020
|
1095718
|
YOGA
|
Sanjeev Rajpal
|
Class 7- Cutting Machine, Cutting Blades, Electric Circular Saw, Electric
Jig Saw, Electric Grinders, Electric Tools, Electric Tools, Electric Motor,
Welding Machine, Power And Machine And Machine Tools Included In Class 7
|
Registered and valid upto December 09, 2023
|
1688559
|
YOGA
|
Akshay Thapar
|
Class 8- ALL TYPES OF CUTLERY, KNIFE AND SCISSORS
|
Registered and valid upto May 19, 2018
|
1744365
|
|
Shri Shamsher Singh Nandwani
|
Class 25- Readymade garments and hosiery goods
|
Registered and valid upto October 16, 2018
|
1822731
|
|
Zergroup Holding
|
Class 9- Nautical, Surveying, Photographic, Cinematographic,
Optical, Weighing, Measuring, Signalling, Checking (Supervision), Life-Saving
And Teaching Apparatus And Instruments; Apparatus And Instruments For
Conducting, Switching, Transforming, Accumulating, Regulating Or Controlling
Electricity; Apparatus For Recording, Transmission Or Reproduction Of Sound
Or Images; Magnetic Data
|
Registered and valid upto May 27, 2019
|
1963536
|
|
Sri Nakoda Enterprises
|
Class 34- Match Boxes
|
Registered and valid upto may 11, 2020
|
In addition to the registered marks, the search
revealed certain marks which are pending registration. Some of the marks
noteworthy were Yoga /filed vide Application No.
2910241 in the name of KRISHNA MUNSHI for services in class 41 i.e. for provision
of sports, health club, gymnasium, fitness center, fitness activities, and
provision of recreation, amusement facilities and activities, including
aerobics, dances, choreography, forms of exercises, cinema theatre, art gallery
services, provision of training, lecture and instructional guidelines,
facilities and services, educational lifestyle, and filed
vide Application No. 1988253 in the name of BHARAT THAKUR for services in class 41
i.e. for training in yoga, yoga instructions. The said applications are
pending registration before the Trade Marks Registry.
Court’s Stance on Registration of YOGA related terms as a
Trademark
Institute for Inner Studies & Ors. Vs. Charlotte Anderson & Ors. (CS(OS) 2252/2011)- In this case, the Plaintiff sought to restrain the Defendants from teaching the asanas, which were claimed to have been developed by their founder, and also claimed proprietary rights over the term Yoga. However, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court ruled that exclusive rights over yoga asanas and pranic healing, which are derivatives of ancient yoga techniques in India, cannot be claimed under Indian law of Trademarks and the Indian Copyright Act.
The
specific question of whether copyright subsists in yoga asanas was discussed in
the U.S. in Bikram Yoga Case where the Court held that yoga asanas
do not satisfy the requirements of a dramatic work and that it cannot be
considered choreography because of the simplicity of its sequences.
Bikram Yoga Case
Bikram’s
Yoga College v Evolution
Yoga,
105 U.S.P.Q.2D
(BNA) 1162 - In this case, Mr. Bikram
Choudhury, an Indian yoga teacher residing in the U.S. and founder of Bikram Yoga, a form of hot yoga
performed in a series of 26 hatha yoga postures done in a hot environment of 40
°C, wrote a book called Bikram’s Beginning Yoga Class, and registered his copyright in this
work with the Copyright Office. Interestingly, Mr. Choudhury was not only
claiming rights in the book itself but also in the sequence of 26 asanas taught
in the book.
An
organization called Open Source Yoga Unity challenged this registration and
asked the U.S. District Court, California to issue a declaratory judgment
saying that Mr. Choudhury could not have exclusive rights over the sequence of
26 yoga asanas.
The
courts left the decision up to a jury to determine if the sequence was
protectable, but the case was settled and a decision was never reached.
However,
someone put this question to the US Copyright Office for its opinion on the
matter, and in June 2012, the agency issued its Policy Statement, which
concluded that sequences of yoga asanas—or any sequence of exercises or
movements, excluding choreography—could not be protected as compilations,
because these were not compilations of literary works, musical works or any of
the other kinds of works protected by Copyright law.
Within
six months, the Policy Statement formed the basis of another court’s decision.
In December 2012, the U.S. District Court for the Central District of
California was faced with another dispute over Bikram Yoga. This time, the
court held that as a matter of law, a sequence of yoga asanas cannot be
copyrighted and the Copyright Office’s Policy Statement agreed with it.
Indian Court’s Stance on Copyright over YOGA
Institute for Inner
Studies v. Charlotte Anderson CS(OS) 2252/2011
In
this case, the Plaintiffs argued that the Defendants’ use of the yoga
techniques-
i.
amounted
to an infringement of the copyright in literary works under The Copyright Act,
1957;
ii.
the yoga postures and Asanas which state the manner of performing the
Pranic Healing is a choreography work that deserves protection as a dramatic
expression.
- Yoga as an original literary workThe Court referred to the US District Court case of Bikram’s Yoga College v. Evolution Yoga, where the issue pertained to according copyright protection to yoga exercises. The Court held that: “There is a distinction between a creative work that compiles a series of exercises and the compilation of exercises itself. The former is copyrightable, the latter is not.” The Hon'ble Delhi High Court accepted this line of case law and ruled that the Plaintiff could not state that copyright protection for the performance of Pranic Healing techniques can be accorded on the basis of the copyright claim in the book describing, illustrating and compiling the exercises or Asanas of Pranic Healing. The protection will be restricted to the compilation that has been done by the Master, the language and the manner of explanations employed by him in his book and the pictorial content in the book and not for the performance of the techniques themselves.
- Yoga as a dramatic workAs discussed earlier, the specific question of yoga asanas was discussed in the U.S. in the Bikram’s Yoga College case where the Court held that yoga asanas do not satisfy the requirements of a dramatic work and that it cannot be considered choreography because of the simplicity of its sequences. This was because, in the opinion of the Court, “A mere compilation of physical movements does not rise to the level of choreographic authorship unless it contains sufficient attributes of a work of choreography. And although a choreographic work, such as a ballet or abstract modern dance, may incorporate simple routines, social dances, or even exercise routines as elements of the overall work, the mere selection and arrangement of physical movements does not in itself support a claim of choreographic authorship.” Applying the following requirements to the instant case, the Court held that Pranic Healing cannot be accorded copyright protection as a dramatic work.
III. Yoga
& Patent
Patents filed with Indian Patent
Office related to Yoga and Yoga accessories:
Application
No.
|
Title
|
Applicant
|
Status
|
510/KOLNP/2013
|
Method and Apparatus for Yoga Class
Imaging And Streaming
|
YogaGlo Inc.
|
Awaiting Examination
|
8649/DELNP/2011
|
Yoga Device
|
Ashim Ghosh
|
Awaiting Examination
|
3300/CHENP/2006
|
A Seating Device for Supporting a user
sitting in a Cross Legged Yoga Position
|
Ashim Ghosh
|
Granted
|
According to reports, by 2008, the US Patent and Trademark Office had issued
150 yoga-related copyrights and 2,315 yoga trademarks.
Patent
& Yoga controversies
1.
The
India-US patent controversy
Initially Intellectual Property
(IP) was considered to be a field which affects only certain kinds of
industries- technical inventions, music, designs, geographical indications,
movies.
Lately, an industry like yoga too
is not untouched with the unsavoury Intellectual
Property controversies rising up worldwide, particularly in the United States.
Today, Yoga and IP seem to be a hot-button issue.
Yoga, an ancient Hindu discipline of mind and body, attributes its
origin in India dating back to more than 5000 years ago. However, it seems to
be more popular in the U.S. With an estimated 20 million American yoga
practitioners, fueling US$27 billion, yoga has become a gigantic industry in
the US. There are about 100,000 yoga instructors in the U.S., while an
unofficial estimate puts the number of teachers in India at 175,000.
India has been disapproving towards attempts by foreign yoga
teachers claiming that each pose
in their class is not part of the traditional Yoga practice, but their own
unique invention.
Considering the strained situation,
the Indian Government cautioned the U.S. Government of the patents filed
pertaining to Yoga Asanas (Yoga
postures). As a pre-emptive measure, the Indian Government
is making digital copies of ancient drawings showing the provenance of more
than 4,000 yoga poses, to discourage further claims by entrepreneurs like Mr. Bikram
Choudhury.
India has established a team of Hindu gurus and 200
scientists to identify all ancient yoga positions or asanas and register each one to stop "patent pirates"
from stealing its "traditional knowledge".
As of now, they have added 600 asanas to India's Traditional Knowledge Digital
Library
(TKDL) to stop the so-called gurus in the United States and Europe from
patenting established yoga poses as their own.
2.
YogaGlo
The online yoga video
website YogaGlo filed U.S. Patent No. 8,605,152 claiming to cover a “method and
apparatus for yoga class imaging and streaming” taking priority from 13/763,569
(‘569). YogaGlo had previously
filed U.S. Patent Application 13/220,621 (‘621) on August 29, 2011. Original
’621 Application was literally identical to the original ’569
Application. Both the applications were rejected by the USPTO Examiners.
Image source:http://www.google.co.in/patents/US8605152
In spite of having both the patent applications initially
rejected on multiple grounds, YogaGlo sent cease and desist letters to its numerous competitors
providing online yoga instructions, including Yoga International and YogaDownload on August 26, 2013.
YogaGlo amended its specification which led to patent grant
on October 29, 2013 and was allotted Patent No. US 8605152.
Yoga International, concerned by the idea that a company
could get a patent on filming a yoga class, told the yoga community about the letter and the yoga
community went into an uproar. Yoga Alliance, a quasi-trade
association, started a petition asking YogaGlo to withdraw its patent applications
and received over 14,000 signatures.
IV. Yoga
& Design
Yoga
is about 6000 years old physical, mental and spiritual science, originated in
India, aiming to provide better health and transform the body and mind. The practice of yoga
involves a lots of physical movement, bending and stretching.
Specially
designed Yoga mats, towels and apparels are available in the market to be used
during Yoga practice.
Below
is the design infringement case related to Yoga pants:
Lululemon Athletica
Canada Inc. vs. Calvin Klein Inc.
- On August 13, 2012, Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. filed a complaint against Calvin Klein Inc. and G-III Apparel Group. Ltd. in the United States District Court, Delaware alleging that its design patents: D645,644, D661,872 and D662,281 are infringed by the defendants.
- It claimed Calvin Klein was selling pants that "have infringed and are still infringing" on three patents, including one for a distinctive waistband featuring overlapping panels of fabric.
- Later, Lululemon Athletica reached an out-of-court settlement with Calvin Klein, dismissing the lawsuit.
To
view the complaint, please click here
Conclusion
Until now, Yoga was open to everyone but the sudden increase in patent, copyright, and trademark cases has caused anxiety within the Indian Patent and Trade Marks Office. In response, the Government of India has begun the documentation of yoga asanas. The Indian Patent office is creating the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (TKDL) listing all known yoga poses, and making it available to patent offices worldwide so as to protect traditional intellectual information from being pirated. This timely precaution is being taken to avoid another case of Turmeric, Neem, or Basmati.
Traditional
knowledge and practice like that found within Yoga could have been used by
India to create wealth in the form of royalties. But instead, to quote Prime
Minister Modi, it is India’s gift to the world!
References: