India: DIPP makes Statutory Licensing Scheme Applicable to Online Broadcasting
In a recent paradigm shift
regarding the status of internet broadcasting companies, the Department of
Industrial Policy and Promotion (hereinafter referred to as “DIPP”) vide office
memo dated September 5, 2016 gave directions to liberally interpret sections
31D and 2 (ff) of the Copyright Act 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’),
so as to include internet broadcasting companies within the ambit of the
aforesaid sections.
Section 31D of the Act is one of
the most important provisions of the Act, as it deals with compulsory
licensing. Even though the terminology used in the aforesaid section reads as “Any broadcasting organization desirous of
communicating to the public...”, a close reading of the entirety of the
section reveals that this provision (which was introduced by way of the 2012
amendment) is largely directed towards TV and radio broadcasting companies.
This is reiterated by a reading of clause 3 of section 31D, which reads as – “The rates of royalty for radio broadcasting
shall be different from television
broadcasting and the Copyright Board shall fix separate rates for radio broadcasting and television
broadcasting.”
This Office Memo issued by the DIPP
is of considerable importance to the online broadcasting community. This is
bound to have a significant impact on activities like online live streaming of
various media, although the effect of the same is yet to be seen in action. One
very clear cut inference that can be drawn from this memo is that now various
rights holders of media, like music, might have to approach the Copyright Board
for fixation of royalties. This represents a paradigm shift between music right
holders and internet broadcasting companies, as it at least theoretically decreases
the balance of power between the two sides mentioned herein.
No comments:
Post a Comment