If recent
news reports are to be taken as in indication of what India has in store for
Intellectual Property Rights, then the Intellectual Property sector of the
Company is about to be taken over by a storm. It has been reported that an
Intellectual Property Exchange may be established in India, where individuals,
inventors, large corporations, small businesses, entrepreneurs in India as well
as around the world will be able to sell, purchase, license or cross license
intellectual property.
The
exchange is reported to be established and developed under the guidance of the
Ministry of Science and Technology through the National Research Development
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the NRDC). Though no official
announcement has been made regarding the same, it has been reported that an
in-principle agreement has been arrived at in the Ministry of Science and
Technology regarding the setting up of the Intellectual Property Exchange.
Make no
mistake, India is on the developmental speedway when it comes to Intellectual
Property. As per the Annual Reports released by the Office of the Controller
General of Patents, Designs, Trademarks and Geographical Indications, the
Country saw an estimated 30% increase in filing of intellectual property
applications, with the number rising from 2,62,638 applications filed in the
year of 2014-15, to 3,41,086 applications filed in the year 2015-16. The trend
of applications filed for registration of intellectual property in India since
2011-12 to 2015-16, taken directly from the Annual Report as mentioned above is
given below:
(Source: Pg. 05, Annual Reports released by the Office of the Controller
General of Patents, Designs, Trademarks and Geographical Indications, 2015-16)
The
Managing Director of the NRDC, Mr. H. Purushotham was reported to have being
said that the NRDC is in the process of collecting data and setting up the
exchange in the next 8-9 months. He was also reported to have said that the
NRDC has already begun collecting necessary data and information on patents
filed worldwide covering multiple technologies, but primarily focusing on
Agriculture and allied sectors.
It is
reported that the main reason for setting up the Intellectual Property Exchange
was to help patents in India reach their full potential with respect to
commercialization, especially the patents which do not get a platform to be
sold on.
To grasp a
better understanding of the implications of an IP Exchange being set-up in
India, it is pertinent to understand how an IP Exchange typically functions. An
IP Exchange provides a marketplace to facilitate sale, licensing and cross
licensing transactions of intellectual property between two parties in a
speedy, cost-efficient and streamlined manner.
Theoretically,
the IP Exchange would facilitate transactions between inventors and large
corporations by providing a market place which is not only legally sound, but
also has certain rules that shall govern the sale, purchase and/or hedging of
intellectual property rights. If done correctly, an IP Exchange may just as
well be the next best thing to happen our country, creating jobs, ensuring
optimum market growth and in turn resulting in economic development of not only
the parties involved but the entire country as well. An IP Exchange would
provide a speedy, efficient and cost effective process for licensing of
Intellectual Property, and theoretically, it shall provide an alternative to
tedious paperwork, litigation and save both time and money for both the
inventor and the corporation/purchaser. Another aspect of establishing an IP
Exchange would be the benefits it would present to inventors who do not have a
means to showcase their invention, research laboratories as well as
universities. These inventors/institutions do not show up on the radar
generally unless an invention is groundbreaking, and contribute to one of the
largest sources of patent registrations in our country. This fact can be
supported by the Annual Report from the Controller General’s office for the
year 2015-16, which describes the top 5 patentees in India as follows:
(Source: Pg. 07, Annual Reports released by the Office of the Controller
General of Patents, Designs, Trademarks and Geographical Indications, 2015-16)
Ideally,
the setting up of such an IP Exchange in our country will not only bolster the
market and create job opportunities, but it should also increase the
competition in the market. Usually, competition in the marketplace between
sellers usually leads to benefit of the public at large, but the same cannot be
assuredly said for the IP Exchange.
In fact,
all the above advantages that have been detailed above are merely theoretical.
In due time, it is possible that reality would enter the frame and render some
of the above advantages moot. There are many factors which ruin the idealistic
scenario that has been painted above.
An aspect
of the IP Exchange which might prove somewhat problematic is who would have the
power to decide and regulate the price of an intellectual property right being
sold in the IP Exchange? Will it be determined by the Licensee/Creator/Inventor
who is selling his intellectual property, and if so, what is to stop the
Licensee/Creator/Inventor from fluctuating the price to whatever he/she deems
fit while selling the rights to different parties?
If the fluctuation
of prices are to be determined by the market value, the principle of demand and
supply, will a private agency be appointed to set the base prices or will the
NRDC itself be overlooking this aspect? What safeguards will be put in place to
ensure there are no market crashes or artificial price rigging? If the IP
Exchange is to function in a manner analogous to the share market, then the
base price would anyhow be decided by the inventor/creator if the intellectual
property, and in view thereof, will there be guidelines as to how the price is
determined?
There might
as well arise a situation where one Licensee has paid more than another
Licensee for the same rights, and in such a case, where can the Licensee go for
redressal of their grievances? Will there be a separate redressal agency set up
solely for the purpose of governing the IP Exchange? Or will the parties
subject to such a transaction have to approach the Competition Commission
claiming anti-competitive practices are being undertaken? Which judicial
authority shall have the jurisdiction with regard to disputes arising out of
such transactions?
It does not
inspire much confidence that despite having signed a contract, there are so
many variables present, making the entire transaction vulnerable to a
protracted litigation battle, thereby defeating the very purpose of the IP
Exchange being set up. It is evident that there is absolutely no legislative
foundation to facilitate the start of an IP Exchange. Whether the legislation
is introduced at a later point of time to streamline the process of building an
IP Exchange is still yet to be seen.
However, one thing is certain, there is a lot of groundwork that needs
to be covered with regard to the establishment of an IP Exchange before it can be
deemed feasible in any manner. But if the same is done in a diligent and timely
manner, it can be assured that the advantages and benefits that would be
offered by an IP Exchange may potentially outweigh the disadvantages, ensuring
that every inventor/creator receives the recognition, exposure and incentive
that they deserve. In fact, if done right, it can safely be assumed that the IP
Exchange would be considered as an incentive for such creators/inventors to use
this funding to further their research and development and thereby come up with
new, better inventions/intellectual property.
No comments:
Post a Comment