John Oliver tries hard to make Donald Drumpf Again!!
On February 28, 2016, on
the third episode of the third season, comedian John Oliver delivered a 22
minute segment about Donald Trump and his ongoing Presidential Campaign.
Oliver’s show, Last Week Tonight, is an American late-night talk and news
satire television program airing on HBO in the United States, which takes a
satirical look at news, politics, and current events on a weekly basis.
In the final portion of
his February 28, 2016 segment, John Oliver urged viewers to refer to Donald
Trump as "Drumpf", which is Trump family's ancestral name. There
exists controversy over when the Trump family changed their name from Drumpf to
Trump. Gwenda Blair in her biography, “The Trumps: Three Generations That Built
an Empire” had mentioned that, the name change occurred way back in the 17th
century where an ancestor of Donald Trump changed their name from Drumpf to
Trump. Other sources have claimed that the name change occurred more recently
in the late 19th century when Donald Trump’s grandfather, Frederick Drumpf
changed his name to Frederick Trump. Frederick Trump was a German immigrant who
would later go on to become a naturalized citizen of the United States of
America in 1892.
He further registered the
web domain "donaldjdrumpf.com", selling amongst other things, baseball
caps, hoodies, T-Shirts, etc. However, this is not the first occasion that a well-known
political figure’s name was utilized in connection with a trademark application.
In 2010, the marks OBAMA PAJAMA, OBAMA BAHAMA PAJAMAS, BARRACK’S JOCKS and so
forth, were barred from registration in light of the fact that the imprints
made an immediate association with President Barack Obama. Almost overnight,
the DRUMPF mark became “in use,” but unfortunately for the critiques of Donald
Trump, trademark registration requires more than just ‘use’. Under 15 U.S.C. §
1052 of the Lanham Act registration of a designation that identifies a particular
living individual, absent written consent, is barred. The section states that,
“No
trademark by which the goods of the applicant may be distinguished from the
goods of others shall be refused registration on the principal register on
account of its nature unless it, consists of or comprises a name, portrait, or
signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written
consent.”
Names can be registered
as marks, however, consent is required if the individual bearing the name will
be associated with the mark or if the person is well known or publically
connected with the goods and services. The DRUMPF application, is somewhat more
complicated since Drumpf is not actually Donald Trump’s surname. It is
allegedly Donald Trump’s original family name that has long since been changed.
Assuming that there are no long-lost Drumpf relatives still using the name,
Drumpf may not technically fall under the “living person” requirement of the
section since the Drumpf name has been reportedly changed and is not a known
living person. Or at least this was John Oliver’s hope in filing the
application.
However, amidst the
ongoing legal battle, it seems that John Oliver has achieved his purpose, as it
does not matter now whether the application for DRUMPF trademark will be
rejected or accepted. Regardless the USPTO’s decision, the result is something
that John Oliver should be happy of: either the DRUMPF application is not
associated with a living person and proceeds to potentially obtaining
registration, or an Examiner rejects the DRUMPF application due to association
with a living person, i.e., Donald Trump.
No comments:
Post a Comment