India
is one of the largest suppliers of low cost generic medicines in the world. The
use of generic medicines, in comparison with their branded counterparts, has
the potential to substantially reduce out-of-pocket expenditure on drugs for chronic
diseases like cancer. Friction between generic
drug manufacturers and innovation companies typically arise when generic drug
manufacturing companies initiate research using a patented product, to submit
information to regulatory bodies like Drug Controller General of
India, to seek approval for introducing a generic version of a patented
product. Bayer vs Cipla case for
development of generic drug “sorafenib” for patent product ‘Nexavar’ is
a landmark case in this regard. Though the generic drug manufacturer is allowed to
introduce the generic version subsequent to patent expiration, the research on
patented drug is carried out when the patent is still in force. Several
countries, including India, have provisions governing such research activities.
The
Indian Patent Act, hereinafter referred as “Act” includes provisions that
facilitate research and development using patented product/process without
being liable for infringement. Such an exemption from patent infringement is
known as Bolar Exemption. Section 107A (a) of the Act provides
bolar provision as mentioned below:
107A. Certain acts not to be
considered as infringement. – For the purpose of this Act,
(a) any act of making,
constructing, using or selling or importing a patented invention solely for
uses reasonably relating to the development and submission of information
required under any law for the time being in force, in India, or in a country
other than India, that regulates the manufacture, construction, use or sale of
any product;…
shall not be considered as an
infringement of patent rights.
The above provision
is not limited to pharmaceutical products, but also extends to any
product/process that may require regulatory approvals.
Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) is a non-profit,
self-governed organization providing emergency
aid to people affected by armed conflict, epidemics and natural disasters, it
includes distribution of affordable medicines like generic drugs to them. A recent move by the European Union (EU) to
introduce an enforcement mechanism for IP rights has been criticized by the MSF in
its recent 2018 letter to EU. Under the said enforcement mechanism, the court
is empowered to grant ‘provisional injunction’ for infringement of patent. Further,
the proposed provision also grants extraordinary right to the patent holder to
draw everyone in the manufacturing and supply chain into litigation, if found
suspected of patent violation, even without any actual proof of it. Furthermore,
the scope of above said regulatory provision is so wide that it may even drag
to the court the third-party procurers of generic drugs, such as MSF, that
supplies affordable generic medicines to low income countries around the
world. Hence, the said provision is vague and unethical.
No comments:
Post a Comment